«

»

Dec 29

Modify Your Criticism, Please

FISCAL CLIFF NOTES
 

WeeThePeople

 

 

snowjob_500

 
 
 

Because two cartoons are better than one! And because no matter what happens, this much is sure: both Democrats and Republicans will sell us out, and Obama will happily go along. Maybe I’ll run into some of you under a bridge some day, scraping food out of can. If so, be sure to say hello!

 
 


 

SENATE SAYS: F*** YOU
 
(AS IN “FISA”)
 


Phelan_FuckYou_72dpi_20cm
 

 

Let’s face it – we don’t have the 4th Amendment anymore. We don’t have the 5th, or 6th, or 1st. Only remnants. Ever since the Patriot Act and its evil spawn have been passed, we have only the most tattered shreds of the Bill of Rights. While most Americans are sleepwalking, including — nay, especially — the most educated, our rights are being shot to hell. Our politicians give us the middle finger, over and over and over again, so that the latest news about it just becomes par for the course. 
 
And get something straight: the Democrats have enabled this. The Obama administration has not only continued but expanded the worst abuses of the Bush administration. Bravo to all of you who voted for Mr. Hope and Change and, better yet, who continue to defend him.

 
 


 
TRUTH

 
 

rape_pregnancy_rect

 

 
While the U.S. media is steadily reporting on the riots engendered by the brutal rape (and perhaps murder, since she’s near death) of a young medical student in India — and it is a horrific story that deserves reporting — they’re conveniently forgetting that we have our own dirty little problem with rape in this country. Especially in the military, where American women are more likely to be assaulted by their own supposed comrades than to be hurt in combat. And given the culture of rape at the country’s military academies — especially the Air Force Academy, which has long been rape central — we shouldn’t be surprised. The powers-that-be in this country don’t care about the victims of rape, anymore than they care about the victims of their war policies.
 
 


I’ve been a subscriber to The Baffler for years. But I confess I had never heard of Jacobin until yesterday. (Too much to read, can’t keep up.) Now I see that there’s a bit of a tempest brewing between the two, or at least a fascinating and important debate. What is progressivism? What is leftist politics? What is radicalism? What is revolution? How do we accomplish anything? These questions are timeless, and it would be foolish to expect people not to disagree over them. -Lisa Simeone
 

Mona-Lisa-OWS

 

Modify Your Criticism, Please

 

Left-wing generationalism is on display on the pages of this month’s Jacobin as editor Peter Frase responds to Baffler contributor Thomas Frank’s criticism of the ethos of the Occupy movement.

The Baffler is a colorful journal of anti-neoliberal polemic that hit its stride in the 1990s after Frank founded it in the late ’80s. Critic, editor, and historian John Summers recently revived the magazine under the aegis of MIT Press. Jacobin is one of the next generation’s theory-heavy attempts to update cultural criticism and deliver itself from beneath the heavy shadow of predecessors.

As is considered proper in polite society, before raising his gun, Frase takes pains to acknowledge his cultural and intellectual debt to The Baffler. Writing of the two book collections that came out of the magazine’s initial run, he gives a review that should make any committed dissident blush: “Clear-eyed, angry, and free of jargon, the essays in “Commodify Your Dissent” exposed the fatuity of “alternative” culture and its corporatized rebellion, while those in “Boob Jubilee” tackled a dominant neoliberal populism that praised the market as democracy’s purest form.” A trenchant response to the conventions of the age, Frase writes, The Baffler was a necessary stop on the evolutionary road that produced Jacobin, and whatever will follow.

But Frase’s praise for the magazine and its founding voice ends there.

In the latest issue of The Baffler, Frank was critical of Occupy Wall Street. The movement is precious to those who were involved; and although it has mostly disappeared from the public eye, it is still churning in classrooms, Brooklyn flats, editorial offices, and low-income neighborhoods devastated by hurricanes. Those who continue to work to honor its goals are put off when middle-aged men with secure paychecks merely tally the group’s weaknesses in print.

Frase does not like Frank’s characterization of the movement, which says the use of impenetrable language and the group’s unwavering commitment to nothing-happens-till-we-all-agree democracy stand as testament to “the lazy, reflexive libertarianism that suffuses our idea of protest these days.”

“This demonstrates the limitations of the curmudgeonly politics that he pioneered with The Baffler,” Frase responds. OWS is composed mostly of disenfranchised young people who are trying to spark a widespread social recovery 30 years into the life of a society lulled into consumer confusion by neoliberalism. The agitators don’t know what they’re doing; they’re learning by doing. Their movements are awkward and some of their beliefs mistaken. Shouldn’t this be understood by Frank, a member of the old guard? “Here,” says Frase, “the laziness and reflexivity is Frank’s.

“Frank is unwilling to see the strains of thought in existing protest movements as raw material for something more effective, and treats them only as self-defeating dead ends,” Frase continues. “Perhaps this is why he seems to have no prospective vision whatsoever, beyond staging historical reenactments of the protest movements of the past. His essay ends by enjoining activists to ‘reenact Flint, Michigan, circa 1937,’ or even ‘Omaha, 1892.’ ”

—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.

Peter Frase at Jacobin:

The inability to sympathize with the people who produced Occupy leads Frank to set himself up as a fun-loathing scold. He makes much of Slavoj Zizek’s injunction that Occupy needed to guard against falling in love with itself, because “carnivals come cheap.” The carnival is portrayed as a distraction from the real work of politics. But while the carnival was insufficient, it was not meaningless. The collective ecstasy of OWS’s “carnival” is something that needs to be part of the Left, even if it can’t be the whole of it. This is the point Audrea Lim makes in the last issue of Jacobin, and that Barbara Ehrenreich makes, about revolutionary joy more generally, in Dancing in the Streets.

Read more

 
If you wish to be removed from this list, please let us know
 
To join the Liberty Underground News service email libertyuv@hotmail.com with “join” for a subject
 
You may also join our talk group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/ if you would like to participate
 
or join our Facebook group here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/461619557192964/
 
 
Tell your friends about LUV News because some people just don’t get it